On May 9th 1997, a weird little sci-fi action flick called The Fifth Element was released in theaters, from the same man who had recently brought audiences Nikita and Léon: The Professional. It was widely lauded/derided for being the one of the best/worst science fiction films ever made. It delighted/pissed off everyone who had the chance to see it. It was nominated for prestigious awards/Golden Raspberries, and is regularly cited for how well/terribly it tackled gender themes, design, and humor.
Twenty years later, no one can seem to agree on where it belongs in the pantheon of sci-fi cinema—and it’s safe to say, that is part of its unyielding charm.
Story goes, the general concept for the film was something that director Luc Besson created as a teenager while trying to stave off boredom. Besson would later claim that he saw Star Wars around the same time, and would be inspired to create a film on a similar scale… but that when he finally started making movies, the technology was still too far behind to create the film he wanted to make. After enough advances were made, Besson would work for years to make the movie a reality, obtaining the funding and the talent for it. He hired Jean Giraud (Moebius) and Jean-Claude Mézières to work on the film’s production design, inspired by their work in comics. He got the legendary designer Jean Paul Gaultier to create every meticulous costume. He talked Gary Oldman into playing Zorg by helping to finance one of Oldman’s other projects after they worked together on Léon. He created a 400-word alien language for Milla Jovovich to learn as Leeloo. He hired an unconventional cast compiled of veteran actors, comedians, musicians, and models.
The Fifth Element is an odd duck because it seems as though any of its more bombastic leanings should cancel one another out, and yet it somehow manages a delirious cohesion. It is loud and dark, funny and frightening, heavy-handed but full of mesmerizing and carefully rendered detail. It is the cinematic equivalent of Rococo artwork, of New Years Eve fireworks, of a gorgeous rainbow cocktail that gives you the worst hangover of your life. It is really no wonder that some people are drawn to it like moths, while others bounce off of it and run the other way.
It is a movie that is full of contradictions as well, perhaps too many to number. It seems to deride reliance on technology and slavish adherence to consumerism—yet many of the vibrant visuals that draw the audience in are resultant from those technologies and objects. It is a story about a woman who was created to save the universe—but she can only manage it if a man will tell her that he loves her. It is a film that extols the average Joe masculinity of men like Bruce Willis—and then counters it with some of the queerest, un-macho, gender-bending male costars that have ever been seen in a blockbuster. It is a tale about the folly of humanity in creating the means of its own destruction—but still relies on the presence of Absolute Evil to bring about total annihilation. These contradictions make it a strange film to critique; focusing on any one of these aspects can result in a massively different reading of the film.
The greatest strength of The Fifth Element is by far its sense of humor, which is something that most big-budget science fiction films never even attempt, much less manage to pull off. The effectiveness of that humor is bolstered by the sharpness of a script that regularly intercuts separate but related conversations with dizzying speed, making flawless editing one of the keys to its success. Everything that the film excels at only plays into the comedy; the lavish surroundings, the clutter, the costumes, the precise soundtrack. The fact that the film is funny also helps to assuage some of the cognitive dissonance for how over-the-top everything is, from Zorg’s tantrums to Mister Shadow’s appearance as a giant ball-of-black-whatever in space to Ruby’s non-stop patter. The way the humor dissipates is entirely centered on Leeloo’s emotional and mental state—when she is frightened or angry or in need of help, the film takes her needs seriously. But darker events that occur around everyone else, events that could be harrowing or disturbing—as when Korben Dallas is held up for money at his own front door by a man who is clearly incredibly high—are always meant to be viewed with a sense of humor.
The giddy design of the film’s locales were purposefully rendered with garishness in mind; Besson was tired of seeing dark, dingy spaceship corridors in science fiction and wanted his film to depict a “cheerfully crazy” glimpse of the future. There is a sense of constant transgression built into the film by repeatedly denying its audience the tropes that they are comfortable with in this way; the future is messy but full of color and warmth; the scientists who reconstruct Leeloo from the Mondoshawan crash keep assuming that someone with such perfect DNA must be male; the main protagonists never meet their main antagonist (Zorg is completely unaware of Korben’s existence and vice versa). The Fifth Element has a familiar mythic structure, but it is tempered by moments of sheer sacrilege in communication of that arc.
At the center of the story is the titular Fifth Element, a character of great polarization among viewers, fans, and critics. There have been countless deconstructions of Leeloo, and she contributes to some honestly aggravating conceits for Strong Female Characters, whether it’s the “silent, ass kicking young woman” who seems to be everywhere these days, or the recently named “Born Sexy Yesterday” problem that plagues many female protagonists. There’s also the fact that she refuses to do her world-saving without confirmation that Bruce Willis loves her, which could strike anyone as a little negligent. (It doesn’t help that we all know she could do better than Dallas, proficiency with spaceships and guns not withstanding.)
But it’s hard to deny that very few female heroes are permitted the range that Leeloo is allowed in such a short span of time; innocence coupled with wisdom, strength alongside immense vulnerability. Most of this is down to Jovovich’s performance, which is captivating from the first frame. She can move from wide-eyed wonder to tears in the space of a moment, and it’s hard to feel as though you’re not being pulled into her orbit the same way Korben is. If the ending of the film seems too corny, it’s easy to believe that the two of them go their separate ways not long after the finale—they don’t really seem like a romance that will outlast the burning of the sun. Leeloo’s desire to learn and grow and experience life is clearly around for the long haul, though.
Many readings of The Fifth Element center on the gender dynamics, either by narrowing in on Leeloo’s simultaneous fulfillment and rejection of certain feminine tropes, or focusing on the interesting mixed signals the film gives off about masculinity. Korben Dallas is like most characters that Bruce Willis has played over the course of his career—sarcastic everymen who offer a sort of updated version of the cowboy archetype, cynical until the right moment comes along and something softens them up. There are critiques of the film that point to the fact that every other man in the story seems entirely incompetent next to Dallas, making his particular brand of manliness seem supernatural by comparison.
But this reading leaves out the proper deference due to radio DJ Ruby Rhod (whose name is either a reference to a periodic table pun, a component of laser design, a cute play on feminine and phallic combinations, or some amalgam of any of these), a role originally designed with Prince in mind before going to comedian Chris Tucker. Rhod is one of the characters who divides audiences and critics, but love or leave him, the film is a completely different animal without his presence. The desire for the character to play around with gender norms was intrinsic from the beginning; figuring that the look might be a hard sell, Besson came prepared with costume sketches for Tucker, showing him variations on the outfits that ended up on camera. When Tucker proved wary, as Besson was expecting, he showed him even more flamboyant costume design options… which led to Tucker accepting the initial drawings as the more mellow option.
It would be easy to say that Ruby is there to make Korben look “cooler” by being the frightened, effeminate counter to Dallas’s rugged machismo. But Rhod is always rendered as sexually appealing to practically all women and to his queer entourage—which still marks him as a powerful person according to traditional tenets of masculinity. He is beloved by countless fans, he has wealth and fame. Moreover, while Ruby spends his initial time with Korben struggling to get the man to say more than a word in reply to his questions, the eventual result of their time at Floston Paradise shows Korben willfully participating in Ruby’s show in order to receive his aid, an inevitable trade as the show is live during the attack on the resort. In short, Ruby Rhod gets exactly what he wants from the situation; the “best show he ever did.”
People can choose to quibble with the character’s construction or depiction, which certainly comes with its own pitfalls and debatable points. But when all is said and done, there has never been a male character in an action-filled blockbuster who was more openly flamboyant, transgressive, and enveloped in queer codification than Ruby Rhod. That filmmakers have been so afraid to emulate that bold choice makes Ruby special, but it’s impossible not to criticize his lonely status in cinema.
Characters and gendered thematic resonance aside, The Fifth Element is a movie that aims to engage as many senses as possible. It is full of slick textures and dimension, practical effects and sets, music that overtakes. If the film were known only for the showstopping “Diva Dance” number, that would be a good enough reason for its legacy—an utterly alien experience with unmistakable visuals and melodies that linger on forever. It makes the most out of what film does best. In that way, it is hardly surprising that Besson was enamored of Star Wars, as George Lucas has always had a similar approach to film: medium first and story second. It doesn’t work for many creators to function this way, but Besson has an incredible knack for making his style into substance, rather than divorcing those two concepts entirely.
Film critic Armond White has said that Besson writes stories that are about “conscientious resistance to human degradation.” The Fifth Element bears out under that observation; many characters are working to aid evil, and many more are doing nothing to stop it, but the film is unerringly optimistic about humanity’s ability to retreat from darkness. While the viewer is encouraged to ask the same questions that Leeloo asks of herself and those around her, to wonder at the value of preserving life when it is full of suffering, the ultimate answer is still one of hope. Zorg may believe in destruction, but Besson has deliberately equipped him with faulty reasoning; in the film, he makes the argument that life is built on chaos, reciting his own version of Bastiat’s “parable of the broken window” without knowing that the old French economist already broke this concept down as a fallacy in the 19th century. Zorg is meant to sound smart and appear competent, but he is mistaken on the most basic level—while even the most inept agents of good are still plugging away at averting the impending disasters of their era.
You could go so far as to say that The Fifth Element believes you do not have to recognize evil in order to fight back against it. You simply have to care enough to get up off your butt and do something. And you can do it in cheesy technicolor and rubber suspenders and three-dimensional traffic. Austerity gets you points as far as the Academy is concerned, but if you want to stick in people’s minds, you have to add in a few blue aliens and weird stones with symbols etched into them. Film is an art form for our eyes and ears, and sometimes that should be rewarded with more than period costumes and sorrowful string sections.
So it’s been twenty years. And The Fifth Element is still the best/worst science fiction film you’ve ever seen. Then again, we’re still talking about it… which means it probably can’t be all bad.
Emmet Asher-Perrin isn’t going to bother to deny her adoration for this movie. You can bug her on Twitter and Tumblr, and read more of her work here and elsewhere.
I vote that it’s one of the best. Even if it is awful.
Okay, yes, technically it’s plot is (to roughly quote an old pre-movie quiz at the theater I went to as a teenager) “a giant ball of evil goo is threatening the earth, and it’s up to a New York taxi driver to save the world” (plus Leeloo, of course). It’s ridiculous. And it revels in its ridiculousness. That’s why it’s so damn good. And the casting, from Gary Oldman going full-on over the top and beyond, to Chris Tucker’s faaaaabulous Roo-Bee Rodddddd!!!!! are absolutely spot on.
Sorry, but this is one of my favorite bad movies ever.
Love/Hate is definitely right: I did not enjoy this on first viewing, even though I appreciated all that was good about it.
I was simply expecting something hard, gritty and serious, like Leon and Nikita. And this most certainly wasn’t.
But it’s definitely required viewing for anyone coming into SF movie fandom, along with the first Matrix, Galaxy Quest, Aliens and others (limiting myself to just the last couple decades). And it’s wonderful for its quips, its goofiness, and the obvious love Besson showed for the genre. I can’t wait for Valerian.
I remember being soured on this when it first came out because it was being touted as “this generation’s Star Wars”. I eventually learned to like it as its own thing, but it’s not one I’ve rewatched much at all. Perhaps it’s time to see it again and see if/how my perception of it has changed.
I adore this movie — it’s one of those movies I will drop everything for if I stumble across it on cable. It knows exactly how ridiculous it is and revels in it. The Fifth Element is silly and loud and pretty to look at and fun, and everyone in it seems to be having a good time, and who doesn’t need some joy every now and then?
I’m definitely in the Love camp for this movie. It is a movie that whenever I find it on television, I’m captivated until the end. Yes, it’s campy and it’s plot is not very original. Besson created an incredible SF world, though, that the viewers get to romp through for 2 hours. For years I’ve been wanting Besson to return to this movie world, not to make a sequel or prequel, but just to make something in it again. I also cannot wait for Valerian this summer.
I hate every part of it and yet I love the movie as a whole. I spend a lot ot time watching the movie in the golden era of VHS.
Luc Besson failed to reiterate that in his other movies. They are all stupid but with some sens of humour. It worked with this charming Fifth Element, it didn’t with neither The Family, Lucy, The Extraordinary Adventures of Adèle Blanc-Sec and absolutely everything he produces.
I am very afraid with what he is doing with Valerian…
What, 5 comments and no mentions of the Leelo Dallas mool-tee-pass?!?
I’ve always loved this movie – I’m no cinema critic but I like what I like. It also has quotes I still repeat today with friends who also quote movies: – Zorg saying with restraint, “I am very disappointed!” – Ruby, “To my right, a row of ministers, more sinisters than ministers,”. Also love the look on Corbin’s cat’s face when she’s watching the commercial with Ruby.
It’s a movie I will watch and occasionally think about, and you summed it up beautifully, it’s probably as good as it could ever be and still be fun, a little more serious, a little more solid, it would be boring.
i’ve never been able to watch more than ten consecutive minutes of this movie. Three if Oldman is on the screen.
Love, love, love this movie. I agree with the OP and most of the comments above. It is ridiculous and wonderful.
But I had to drop in to say I can’t believe one can write a whole review/analysis of the good and bad in this movie without mentioning Ian Holm’s wonderfully assured performance. He is simply never bad, and is at his best here, playing a ridiculous and thankless role with aplomb and grace.
Put me down in the “hated it” column. I found it aggressively stupid and obnoxious, although I grant it has very imaginative visuals. I might not hate it quite so much if it didn’t star Chris Tucker, an actor whose perfomances make fingernails on a chalkboard seem soothing by comparison. But there’s a lot else that annoyed me about it too.
“Gimme da cashhhhh!”
“Autowash”
“Yeah. She knows it’s a multipass.”
“You are fired!”
“Thanks Ray.”
I love so many scenes in that movie.
This movie belongs in the subgenre of “movies that would be better if the world wasn’t ostensibly in peril” (which also includes many comic book movies, such as Suicide Squad and many of the MCU movies that feature only a single superhero). It’s a zany adventure with a tacked on “world in peril” plot. The movie would be much better if the stakes were smaller (think “Die Hard” in space) and Leelo was a mercenary or something. As one example among many, it defies belief that the government’s only way to get Korben off-world is by rigging a contest… but a private individual has a craft that can be piloted by one man which takes him there directly. The government doesn’t have one of those, or the ability to commandeer/borrow one from a private individual?? (Similar problems arise in those other movies I mention, i.e., if this is a global threat, then where is everybody else who should be responding?) Smaller stakes can make a better movie.
The script also can’t make up its mind whether just the Earth is in peril or the whole galaxy is,the priests are aggressively incompetent at their one job, the early scenes from Ancient Egypt feel like they’re beamed in from a different movie, the resolution to the threat is nonsensical, and on and on.
The “rigging the contest” was more of a way of Korban conveniently going along with the government’s plan. It makes more sense having a contest winner, who has reason to there, instead of someone just showing up. Earlier in film the ship carrying LoLo was attacked and there was a good chance whoever attacked would go after the stones. So why not have someone has skills to fend off the potential attack.
The title is missing a “the”
20 Years On, The Fifth Element is Still One of Best/Worst Sci-Fi Films Ever
But have no fear, I found it in the first paragraph:
“It was widely lauded/derided for being the one of the best/worst science fiction films ever made.”
I find that very funny for some reason.
Count me among the people that love this movie. In fact it is probably second only to The Princes Bride as the movie I have watched the most times.
@17 – Title fixed, thank you!
@@.-@. Andrewwillett
“It knows exactly how ridiculous it is and revels in it.”
Yes! This, exactly — that’s why it works so well. This is NOT a movie to be taken seriously, but rather enjoyed.
great movie . over the top . funny . i must watch it 3 times a year . lol . anybody else want to negotiate ?
@16, I’m not really buying that given the ticking clock that there was much value in going through the ordeal of having him “win a contest” so he “had a reason to be there,” rather than generating some other cover (to the extent cover was needed at all– it was a tourist destination, after all, and it’s not clear who would be asking too many questions if he just showed up with cash to spend). What’s more, just about any cover is going to be more effective than “DJ announcing your every move.”
@21 The military doesn’t seem particularly competent.
The contest was the only cover available because the hotel (and planet?) was totally booked up. So it was either the contest or an overt and official mission.
Great movie and but sure why nobody mentioned the dazzling mayhem of the “operatic” scene. Saying Chris Tucker was grating is a bit like saying American culture is since he represented the MTV-derived new TV youth version of that. The one interesting flaw, if you can call it that, is that it lacked the confrontation that is practically mandatory between hero (Willis or was it Leeloo?) and Oldman. Zorg got blowed up real good by only by his own miscalculations and mistakes, not at the hands of Korben or Leeloo. Doubling up with two roughly equal heroes of different genders also wasn’t a bad twist, despite any other gender issues within.
I think comparing it negatively or at all to other Besson films is just silly. If you want directors making films that feel like all the other films they made you can always go with Michael Bay.
@23/Mark Tralbry: My problems with Chris Tucker have nothing to do with “American culture” — what a bizarre non sequitur. My problems have to do with him as an individual, with how irritating his voice and his loudmouthed performance style are. There are countless other performers from the same period of “culture” who are nowhere near as annoying as individuals. He’s not some exemplar of a larger phenomenon, he’s just a single, very irritating person.
“Where did he learn to negotiate like that?”
“I wonder.” Deadpan.
Count me in the Love Camp all the way.
I’m in the “love” camp as well, partly because of the weird mixture of good-hearted sincerity and cynicism, (with the cynicism attenuated almost to the point of disappearance by the end of the movie.)
I love how even the dreary super-efficient housing for singles that has the spot where you stand to submit to the police helpfully marked for you is painted in sunny colors, and you can have somebody in an anti-grav food truck tricked out to look like an old diesel-burning sampan deliver fresh meals directly to your window.
@22– I don’t care how incompetent the military is, they can use the sort of spaceship that’s commercially available to civilians and book a hotel room. And, speaking of, even in the present day there is no such thing as a booked hotel– rather, there is a hotel that says it’s booked but for the right price they will kick out the least important customer, give you their room, and then use a portion of the surplus to make the kicked out room-renter not too terribly pissed off. The importance of the mission just doesn’t track with the extremely silly method used to transport our supposed heroes. And, speaking of, the best thing that Zorg could have done is… nothing. The protagonists only had a ride back because they commandeered Zorg’s ship. Had they had to wait for a return flight in the same manner, they would not have made it back in time. Even if we accept that for some reason the best way to get Korben off-world was to rig the contest, it does not make sense that there would not be a better extraction plan (i.e., have a ship waiting). And that really only scratches the surface– why not use a spaceship to rendezvous with the Diva rather than conduct the transfer at a hotel? The actions of multiple characters fall apart when considering the stakes involved, and all of it is because of a threat that ostensibly threatens to destroy the world (or galaxy, again the script isn’t sure) that has nothing to do with roughly 95% of the movie.
Next time let @13 Christopher Bennett write the review and save all the verbiage trying to invoke anything profound from what is essentially a dumb movie and an insult to the SF genre. (Thank goodness we have moved on at least a bit and get quality works like “The Expanse”). And the bit on Chris Tucker, dead straight on: a performance well deserving of a millennium razzy. This movie is a perfect storm: bad acting, terrible plot, and so-so visuals.
I’m firmly in the Love It camp.
It has a very French sensibility throughout, which is a nice antidote to the usual frontier style American or dystopic British inspired future. The cultural mix, the playful humour, the sheer sense of style …it’s a fantastic film.
Ruby Rhod is irritating as hell for most of it, but he does get a few good lines, and makes for a suitable contrast to Bruce Willis Hero Man.
The complete lack of confrontation between Zorg and Korben is great too – the karmic payoff wouldn’t be nearly so good if it was intentional that he be caught by his own bomb.
I fell for the “new Star Wars” review as well and disliked it for not measuring up, never considering that it was never trying to be and it was the reviewer who was out to lunch, not the movie. I anticipated something serious, and even before Chris Tucker came into it I knew I wasn’t going to get it. I came away thinking it was nutty and not very good. Years later (and older) I watched it again and liked it much better. I think I’ll like it even better the third time.
Love this movie… and what do you mean Leeloo can do better than Korben Dallas? Korben is a stand up kind of guy! He gets stuff done, he’s competent and resourceful. I like to think that he and Leeloo stay together long after the finale so he can keep her out of trouble as she learns to navigate their world.
Ruby Rhod/Chris Tucker is supposed to be annoying. He’s a ‘shock jock’ turned up to eleven, or possibly twelve. Perhaps even higher, as basically everything in this film is turned up to eleven until the knob breaks off, and then sometimes turned up some more.
@33/phuzz: It’s not about Rhod. I find Tucker almost unwatchably irritating in everything I’ve seen him in. I’m a big fan of Jackie Chan, but I’ve never been able to watch Rush Hour more than once because I can’t stand the thought of enduring Tucker’s acting style again. As for Rhod, I’ve seen similar characters in other productions played by other actors, and they were much more tolerable. Even a deliberately annoying character can be fun when played by a charismatic actor (e.g. Danny John-Jules as Cat on Red Dwarf, or Matt Frewer as Max Headroom). Chris Tucker is not that actor.
There’s no bad in The Fifth Element, it’s absolutely, gloriously unique!
The hilarious thing is that until you mentioned it, it never occurred to me that there is no confrontation between Dallas and Zorg. I suppose it just never occurred to me that is normally what would happen.
Here’s hoping that Valerian manages to be at least somewhat as wonderfully bonkers as TFE.
When DVD came out I wondered which films would be worth getting in this new higher quality format… The Matrix and The Fifth Element were the immediate answers. I had no plans to get rid of my VHS collection but boy would Fifth Element be just the thing to see on these DVD things.
I’m with the crowd of people that always will watch some of this film when I come across it on TV, which means I’ve watched the movie perhaps more times than just about anything absent The Matrix (for the same reasons). It certainly has it’s dumb moments (and I’m with the people who find Chris Tucker annoying – it’s simply that I also find that a note perfect and necessary portrayal for the character and for the movie) and some parts show its age more than others (I think it would be a somewhat different ending if made this year).
But what makes it re-watchable is a certain charm and charisma – there are excellent movies I have seen, well made, well acted, well written, well conceived and plotted, and yet seeing them once or twice was more than sufficient, and I’ve no desire to even watch a bit of them again. The Fifth Element just has a strong visual and esthetic appeal that I believe are part and parcel of what makes genre/Sci Fi film making its own unique thing and that more movies could benefit from.
It’s a terrible movie, but I love every last bit of it. I was ensorcelled when I saw Plava Laguna and after that, this movie was alright by me.
I am hoping Besson’s upcoming Valerian will surprise us.
Fascinating to hear that Prince was originally envisioned for the role of Ruby Rhod. He would’ve brought a very, very different take to that role, no doubt — if nothing else, given the height difference, he wouldn’t have towered over everyone around him like Chris Tucker did, especially in the wig.
The “blob of evil” sub-plot in The Fifth Element was taken from a Moebius bande-dessine storyline that got its original big-screen treatment as part of the Heavy Metal animated movie, along with the Korben character driving a flying taxicab and other plot elements.
I actually worked on set of the movie, doing a couple of weeks of prop and SFX stuff during pre-production. I still watch it occasionally, just to say “you see that bit? That’s MY bit.”
It’s an absolutely stupid movie that I can’t help but watch and absolutely enjoy when I catch it channel surfing.
@17 – great minds think alike. Those two movies are the ones that I will always stop and watch if I run across them on TV. Drives my wife nuts because I own them both on DVD. “Why are we watching this with an extra hour of commercials!”
FIRMLY in the “love it” camp. I love “serious” science fiction (The Expanse is one of best shows on tv right now and the Battle Star remake was incredible as well as many other more serious movie and tv shows) But The Fifth Element is one of the only movies that has such a sense of joy and wonder about it. It’s pitch perfect in it’s casting, humor, and campy story line. It’s everything that the 80’s remake of Flash Gordon wanted to be. (although I love that movie for it’s sheer awfulness, great costumes and wonderful “Music by Queen!”)
On a different note entirely, American Gods on Stars is KILLING it right now!
I think a lot of people overlook why the contest was rigged, it was the only way to get Korben there. The ship was booked, the concert sold out, Zorg with his money and connections couldn’t get space on that cruise, the only available ticket was the one earmarked for the contest winner. The galaxy as a whole wouldn’t care if the Earth was destroyed, humans had moved on and out to new worlds, the sympathetic aliens were working to stop the evil not save the humans. It was part of a subtle attempt to show that while it was important to the Earth, the Earth wasn’t really that important to anyone else, that humans are not the end all be all after all.
I think it’s one of the best, and I’ve watched it a few times.
The Fifth Element definitely gets a mull-ti-pass from me.
I’m actually quite shocked to see that some people think it is awful.
Were they expecting serious Sci-fi?
It’s hilarious (the movie, not people expecting serious sci-fi)
@41 nojay Wow, I had noticed the similarity, but didn’t have any idea that it was a direct link. I thought it just came from the general Metal Hurlant, SF BD sensibilities.
One thing that’s always bugged me about the movie is that as I understood it, the scientists cloned Leelo from the remnant of one of the hands from the armored, lumbering aliens that were transporting the stones in the briefcase. Doesn’t that mean that the aliens inside the armor were essentially humanoid? If so, that style of armor certainly seems pessimal.
I love this movie. Period.
Though, given the recent Herbert reread, I have to wonder if a part of the reason I love it so very much is because the world Besson gave us feels so very much like the one Herbert gave us in his BuSab stories (which, in turn, has quite a bit in common with Vance’s Oikumene). The fact that government is hilariously inept and corrupt, the fact that arms dealers are bereft of humanity, the fact that tiny people playing tiny parts with good faith result in galaxy-changing wins for positivity and peace, these are all characteristic of these universes, and that may be why I love them so very much.
This may be the movie of which I’ve purchased the most copies, although that has less to do with my love for the movie itself (which I do love) and more to do with the studio’s tendency to keep releasing slightly-improved versions. And now there’s a 4K disc in the pipeline which, yes, I preordered.
Love it! This movie is a celebration of life in all it’s messy, contradictory glory. I love how crazy the visuals are and yet how it all hangs together.
There’s one thing this review wasn’t quite fair about. Corbin Dallas is not just some guy. He’s a decorated war hero, proficient in a comically long list of weapons and vehicles. He’s clearly adrift at the beginning of the movie after leaving the military and losing his wife, and he was totally wasted on cab driving. He should really be more of a French James Bond than Die Hard. I love Bruce Willis, but now that I think about it, he was probably miscast in this part.
@51/AD: I am now imagining Jean Reno in the role of Corbin Dallas.
@48, no she was cloned from the hand bits left in the sarcophagus, not one of the Mondoshawan hands.
Not the least reason to love this movie (and I adored it from the first viewing) is that there are two kinds of people in the world: those who can appreciate something like The Fifth Element vs. those who can’t, and this movie does a very fine job of sorting them out!
OMG! Yes, it’s cheesy. Yes, it’s totally awful in a good sort of way and yes, every time it’s on TV I make sure I watch it. Flying cars? Aliens? Prophecy? It had me when the spaceship blocked the entrance. How can a show go wrong with Bruce Willis in it?
As a lover of science fiction before it had its own section in the library, I check out every film in that genre and I’m rarely disappointed. It’s not about the music or the plot, it’s about the possibilities…..
Great article!
Put me down in the “Love It” group.
How much do I love it? I have it on LASERDISK.
I watch it any time I’m feeling down and can’t get out of it.
Msgt, USAF, Ret.
Man, I must be a truly useless movie critic, because my undying love for this film (it came out when I was 11, a little too early for any serious critiquing, but not too early for an unhealthy obsession with Milla Jovovich) has completely blinded me to its negative aspects.
Nice try attempting to broaden my outlook or whatever, Ms Asher-Perrin, but you’ve only succeeded in making me me love it even more!
This has become one of my favorite movies. It has so many great elements that mash together perfectly, and as mentioned, I think the comedy is the element that weaves it all together. I never tire of it.
“Autowash!”
I thought this was silly garbage on its initial release and never saw it again. It’s still silly garbage. A hodgepodge of BLADE RUNNER, CLOSE ENCOUNTERS, INDIANA JONES, SPECIES and lots of better films, this is one foolish ride. I remembered Chris Tucker’s Ruby as one irritating character, but, now regard him right up (down) there with Jar Jar Binks as one of the genre’s worst ever. Ugh. I couldn’t help but think how the one hand-to-hand combat scene with Milla Jovovich has made her career and millions of dollars. Of course, it also prevented her acting from being taken seriously.
Both graphic designers, my late husband and I were hooked by this movie in the first few minutes. We often quoted parts from it. Corny, cheesy, over the top, and just plain fun. And every time I watch it (many times), I see visual details I missed previously. But, it’s just my opinion…what do I know? I also loved Buckeroo Banzai!
I don’t think she needed a man to tell her he loved her to decide to save the world. I never took it that way.
She was just horribly traumatized by absorbing all of earth’s history of violence , war, genocide, etc.
The point I always took is that simply experiencing LOVE made it all worth it. That because that exists
that self sacrifice for someone else exists when they love someone, the world was worth saving.
Or has what passes for feminism these days blind us to that simple truth?
I was like 10 when I saw this movie in theatres, and looking back on it, it was definitely “my” star wars
to start with the quote form the article “There’s also the fact that she refuses to do her world-saving without confirmation that Bruce Willis loves her” I think reason this is not a problem is that she is not the fifth element love is
I remember bits and pieces of this from when I was a kid. On a whim, I rewatched it today, and WOW, was I shocked by how weird and over the top this movie is. The whole mess feels like some sort of uncanny valley of so-bad-it’s-good. Its not terrible enough to pass through and become good, and its not good enough to really make me like it–it just sort of lays in the middle. Overall, the best part of the movie is Milla Jovovich and her scantily–but very odd–outfits. Worst part of the movie is a tie between marginal acting of support characters and the absurdly weird costumes. Honestly, what is Bruce Willis wearing, an orange condom? The film is less Star Wars and more Blade Runner, not sure why people got Star Wars vibes from this at all to be honest.
This is for whatever reason one of my all-time favorite films. I can’t explain it, and when I try to convince others to watch it for the first time I stumble to extol its virtues. I think perhaps you have to be of a certain age growing up in a time where Die Hard was old, but Unbreakable was new. Right in that sweet spot of adolescent wistful campiness and macho bravismo, this thing is a visual treasure. I think the Star Wars references come in because this film like SW relies more on placing you in the scene than anything else. The story is, yeah, ok, but the sets and costume design are just fabulously done. You WILL be transported to another place, whether you like it or not. I love this movie. A lot (I own it on laserdisc and I don’t own a Laserdisc player, if that tells you anything). Maybe its viewed through the lens of tween nostalgia, but I love it. Must watch at least once IMHO .
@65 Korbin_salad
I think you nailed it.
Many SF movies are rather straight-line extrapolation from our present or an entirely (and maybe somewhat sterile) bright, new shiny future.
What Star Wars and The Fifth Element give us is societies that might have grown and accreted to become the way they are and that’s why things might not always make intuitive sense to us. People often say the worlds seem “lived in”.
@65/Korbin_salad, I dunno, I saw Die Hard in the theaters (more than once) as a teen (*coughsureIwas18*cough), and I love the Fifth Element, so I don’t think it has anything to do with age. It’s a quirky fun movie with great dialog, a ridiculously over-the-top evil Gary Oldman, costume designs by Moebius, a gorgeous Milla Jovovich, a Loc-Nar… what’s not to love?
To everyone who claims the hero never faced the villain-
Zorg/Oldman wasn’t the main baddie, merely just another incompetant lacky. Mr. Shadow was- and the #1 power couple KO’d him for the grand finale.
It’s taken 20 years to find an article on this film which points out that Dallas and Zorg are oblivious to the existence of the other. It’s also ironic to point out that Korben is one of those involved when Zorg says “fire one million”. I find this one of the most brilliant facets in the story, and one that I have a hard time finding another instance of this nuance.
I just want to say. It’s not that she needed a man to tell her he loves her. I think that love itself is the fifth Element. Leeloo is the embodiment of love. She needs to understand what love is in order to feel like the world is worth saving. There are 5 elements essential to life; earth, water, air, fire… and love.
Someone please explain how this could be considered the worst? Also explaining that she only works if someone says they love her is a bit simplistic and dismissive. Think about it, if the others opened based upon interacting with what they represented then doesn’t it make sense to follow suit with what she represented? You have to understand every element of this movie to truly appreciate every nuance.